Mon contenu
Homme
Je suis d'accord c'était sexiste ce slot féminin et n'aide pas forcément à la promotion du format. Je propose en remplacement pour l'année prochaine un ou plusieurs slot "gros seins" qui pour le coup devrait aider de manière efficace à la promotion du format auprès des jeunes.
#194771 Discussions sur le Classement 2013
Posté
- 12 September 2013 - 09:26
#194539 Theros spoiler
Posté
- 09 September 2013 - 19:36
Ok. Il m'a read, m'a rendu mad, et du coup il a pris 2-0, comme tous mes adversaires du daily d'aujourd'hui. /brag
#194431 Theros spoiler
Posté
- 08 September 2013 - 16:23
D'expérience à magic le bluff est bien moins rentable que de laisser l'adversaire faire une connerie, et c'est un euphémisme.
#190625 Magic 2014
Posté
- 04 July 2013 - 10:05
Oui mais en obligeant les joueurs de Sneak Show à devoir réfléchir et attendre, je pense que tu élimines 90% des joueurs jouant le deck 
#190133 MWS, Cockatrice et Les Troufions
Posté
- 27 June 2013 - 15:33
Champion du monde aujourd'hui :
Je joue contre cephalid breakfast avec mon D&T.
J'ai Thalia en jeu.
C'est son tour, il a Nomads-en-kor et se met en full tap pour jouer Cephalid Illusionist.
Il combo, trouve ses Narco et veut jouer dread return (je rapelle qu'il est full tap).
MairQ puts Dread Return into play from graveyard.
Mokermann points from his Thalia, Guardian of Thraben to MairQ's Dread Return.
11_3 Mokermann: cost 1
11_3 MairQ: thalia said wen a no creature come in to the play
flashback xD
flashback is no put in battle
11_3 Mokermann: dread return isnt a creature spell
so it cost 1 more even in flashback
11_3 MairQ: omg...
11_3 Mokermann: would you ask on the chat ?
11_3 MairQ: oracle said some one is put in battle wen u put it form u hand
11_3 Mokermann: it still a spell cost. Sacrifice 3 creature is an alternative cost but you had also to paid 1 mana
11_3 Mokermann: let ask on the chat dude
Le chat en question.
[15:55] MairQ: wen dead return play as flashback
and the enmy have one thalia in play
the flashback cost one more?
[15:55] Ectoplasm: you pay flashback cost +1
yes
[15:55] MairQ: dead return
[15:55] Ectoplasm: yes
[15:55] MairQ: is no a mana cost
[15:55] Ectoplasm: I know but it still costs +1
you 'play' it
it says so on the card, thalia increases costs of 'playing'
[15:55] MairQ: -.-
ok
[15:56] Ectoplasm:
sorry
[15:56] MairQ: sure?
oracle no say it
[15:56] Ectoplasm: yep
[15:56] MairQ: no
[15:57] MairQ: m...
the flashback cnat cost 1 more
because is no a mana cost
[15:57] Ectoplasm: and?
even casting a force of will
[15:57] MairQ: omg
[15:57] Ectoplasm: will cost 1
[15:57] MairQ: oracle said it
is no a mana cost men
[15:57] Blutsau: exto is right
[15:57] MairQ: wat
wait
[15:58] Mokermann: MairQ, come back to the game, you got your response. As I said, a cost is a cost, no depend of mana, or sacrifice, or paying life
Thalia said +1, it's +1.
[15:59] MairQ: im right
[15:59] Blutsau: you're not
[15:59] mikey234: you arent mair
[16:00] MairQ: 0mg
serius
[16:00] Blutsau: the cost of a spell may be many things
[16:00] mikey234: flashback is a way to cast the spell, thalia says it costs 1 more in addition to the cost youpay
[16:00] MairQ: go to oracle and seach it
im right
[16:00] Cytidine: You're wrong.
[16:00] Blutsau: thalia just tacks one mana ontop of whatever it is
[16:00] Mokermann: Hard to understand -.- it's not about oracle.
Oracle explain the effect or the card,
not to explain this interaction.
[16:00] MairQ: oracle said if isnt a MANA cost thalia or other speels cant do eny
[16:00] Mokermann: your fow will also cost 1 more.
[16:01] MairQ: because halia sai 1 MORE
thalia sai 1 MORE
and it isnt a mana cost
i cant play 1 more
[16:01] Cytidine: Where does oracle say this?
[16:01] mikey234: you are casting the spell
[16:01] mikey234: the fact you arent paying mana doesnt matter
[16:02] Erebus: thalia 100% makes flashback spells cost 1 more
[16:02] mikey234: pull your head out your ass and listen to the judges
[16:02] Cytidine: Quote the Oracle ruling that says Thalia will only work if mana is being paid.
[16:02] MairQ: is no thalia specific
other creatures say some
[16:03] Cytidine: If you can't provide a rules quote or a ruling, you saying you're right means nothing.
[16:04] Thelas: per 601.2e: ". The total cost is the mana cost or alternative cost (as determined in rule 601.2b), plus all additional costs and cost increases, and minus all cost reductions."
[16:04] Thelas: thus, you still apply cost increases even if an alternative cost is being paid
[16:04] MairQ: im right men
isnt a mana cost
[16:04] Mokermann: it doest matter
[16:04] Cytidine: If you're right, you should be able to prove it.
[16:04] MairQ: because thalia cant do eny
dead return is no a mana cost!
[16:05] Cytidine: Thelas even showed you the rule that proves you wrong.
[16:05] Erebus: Okay so what's 0+1?
[16:05] Mokermann: it's a cost. no a mana cost, by flashback, but it's a cost
[16:05] MairQ: no men
because
[16:05] killerintensions: omg dude your wrong everyone has told you so just accept it
[16:06] MairQ: to do flashback i need to sacrifice 3 creatures
[16:06] Thelas: MairQ: rules.wizards.com. Quote a rule. With a number.
[16:06] Erebus: and then thalia makes it cost 3 creatures and 1 mana
[16:06] MairQ: this people..................
[16:06] Mokermann: you cannot play spell without cost. You cast this spell by sacrifing 3 creature, but you HAVE to paid 1 more because of thalia
this people ? ask to yourself bro. You are alone
[16:06] mikey234: (You may cast this card from your graveyard for its flashback cost. Then exile it.) -> Noncreature spells cost {1} more to cast.
[16:06] MairQ: i play so muth with this derk in a tournament and with judges and its legal
[16:07] MairQ: thalia or other creatues with some habili
[16:07] mikey234: that is not a legal play mair
[16:07] MairQ: cant do ey
ahahahahahahaha
[16:07] mikey234: i even point out that thalia and flashback both use the word cast, therefore thalia interacts with it
[16:07] MairQ: lear to play legacy men and reall ALL oracle
[16:07] Sedris: d returns cost 1 more, accept it
[16:07] Thelas: Example after 117.3c in rules:
Example: A player controls Lodestone Golem, which says "Nonartifact spells cost 1 more to cast." Another player removes the last time counter from a suspended sorcery card. That player must cast that spell if able, but doing so costs 1. The player is forced to spend 1 if enough mana is in his or her mana pool, but the player isn't forced to activate a mana ability to produce that 1. If he or she doesn't, the card simply remains exiled.
[16:07] MairQ: Is not a MANA cost!!!!!+
[16:08] mikey234: that doesnt matter
[16:08] Mokermann: that so funny boys. let me sreenshot that.
[16:08] Zoan: just t throw in some more, its absouletly right that thalia those increase flashback costs which don't include mana by 1 mana, i dont even get how you might doubt that
[16:09] Thelas: oh hey look, I found another relevant rule
117.9d. If an alternative cost is being paid to cast a spell, any additional costs, cost increases, and cost reductions that affect that spell are applied to that alternative cost. (See rule 601.2e.)
TLDR : Au final, j'ai gagné le combat mental, mais à une demi-douzaine, on a pas réussi à lui faire comprendre. La vie est rude les amis.
Je joue contre cephalid breakfast avec mon D&T.
J'ai Thalia en jeu.
C'est son tour, il a Nomads-en-kor et se met en full tap pour jouer Cephalid Illusionist.
Il combo, trouve ses Narco et veut jouer dread return (je rapelle qu'il est full tap).
MairQ puts Dread Return into play from graveyard.
Mokermann points from his Thalia, Guardian of Thraben to MairQ's Dread Return.
11_3 Mokermann: cost 1
11_3 MairQ: thalia said wen a no creature come in to the play
flashback xD
flashback is no put in battle
11_3 Mokermann: dread return isnt a creature spell
so it cost 1 more even in flashback
11_3 MairQ: omg...
11_3 Mokermann: would you ask on the chat ?
11_3 MairQ: oracle said some one is put in battle wen u put it form u hand
11_3 Mokermann: it still a spell cost. Sacrifice 3 creature is an alternative cost but you had also to paid 1 mana
11_3 Mokermann: let ask on the chat dude
Le chat en question.
[15:55] MairQ: wen dead return play as flashback
and the enmy have one thalia in play
the flashback cost one more?
[15:55] Ectoplasm: you pay flashback cost +1
yes
[15:55] MairQ: dead return
[15:55] Ectoplasm: yes
[15:55] MairQ: is no a mana cost
[15:55] Ectoplasm: I know but it still costs +1
you 'play' it
it says so on the card, thalia increases costs of 'playing'
[15:55] MairQ: -.-
ok
[15:56] Ectoplasm:
sorry[15:56] MairQ: sure?
oracle no say it
[15:56] Ectoplasm: yep
[15:56] MairQ: no
[15:57] MairQ: m...
the flashback cnat cost 1 more
because is no a mana cost
[15:57] Ectoplasm: and?
even casting a force of will
[15:57] MairQ: omg
[15:57] Ectoplasm: will cost 1
[15:57] MairQ: oracle said it
is no a mana cost men
[15:57] Blutsau: exto is right
[15:57] MairQ: wat
wait
[15:58] Mokermann: MairQ, come back to the game, you got your response. As I said, a cost is a cost, no depend of mana, or sacrifice, or paying life
Thalia said +1, it's +1.
[15:59] MairQ: im right
[15:59] Blutsau: you're not
[15:59] mikey234: you arent mair
[16:00] MairQ: 0mg
serius
[16:00] Blutsau: the cost of a spell may be many things
[16:00] mikey234: flashback is a way to cast the spell, thalia says it costs 1 more in addition to the cost youpay
[16:00] MairQ: go to oracle and seach it
im right
[16:00] Cytidine: You're wrong.
[16:00] Blutsau: thalia just tacks one mana ontop of whatever it is
[16:00] Mokermann: Hard to understand -.- it's not about oracle.
Oracle explain the effect or the card,
not to explain this interaction.
[16:00] MairQ: oracle said if isnt a MANA cost thalia or other speels cant do eny
[16:00] Mokermann: your fow will also cost 1 more.
[16:01] MairQ: because halia sai 1 MORE
thalia sai 1 MORE
and it isnt a mana cost
i cant play 1 more
[16:01] Cytidine: Where does oracle say this?
[16:01] mikey234: you are casting the spell
[16:01] mikey234: the fact you arent paying mana doesnt matter
[16:02] Erebus: thalia 100% makes flashback spells cost 1 more
[16:02] mikey234: pull your head out your ass and listen to the judges
[16:02] Cytidine: Quote the Oracle ruling that says Thalia will only work if mana is being paid.
[16:02] MairQ: is no thalia specific
other creatures say some
[16:03] Cytidine: If you can't provide a rules quote or a ruling, you saying you're right means nothing.
[16:04] Thelas: per 601.2e: ". The total cost is the mana cost or alternative cost (as determined in rule 601.2b), plus all additional costs and cost increases, and minus all cost reductions."
[16:04] Thelas: thus, you still apply cost increases even if an alternative cost is being paid
[16:04] MairQ: im right men
isnt a mana cost
[16:04] Mokermann: it doest matter
[16:04] Cytidine: If you're right, you should be able to prove it.
[16:04] MairQ: because thalia cant do eny
dead return is no a mana cost!
[16:05] Cytidine: Thelas even showed you the rule that proves you wrong.
[16:05] Erebus: Okay so what's 0+1?
[16:05] Mokermann: it's a cost. no a mana cost, by flashback, but it's a cost
[16:05] MairQ: no men
because
[16:05] killerintensions: omg dude your wrong everyone has told you so just accept it
[16:06] MairQ: to do flashback i need to sacrifice 3 creatures
[16:06] Thelas: MairQ: rules.wizards.com. Quote a rule. With a number.
[16:06] Erebus: and then thalia makes it cost 3 creatures and 1 mana
[16:06] MairQ: this people..................
[16:06] Mokermann: you cannot play spell without cost. You cast this spell by sacrifing 3 creature, but you HAVE to paid 1 more because of thalia
this people ? ask to yourself bro. You are alone
[16:06] mikey234: (You may cast this card from your graveyard for its flashback cost. Then exile it.) -> Noncreature spells cost {1} more to cast.
[16:06] MairQ: i play so muth with this derk in a tournament and with judges and its legal
[16:07] MairQ: thalia or other creatues with some habili
[16:07] mikey234: that is not a legal play mair
[16:07] MairQ: cant do ey
ahahahahahahaha
[16:07] mikey234: i even point out that thalia and flashback both use the word cast, therefore thalia interacts with it
[16:07] MairQ: lear to play legacy men and reall ALL oracle
[16:07] Sedris: d returns cost 1 more, accept it
[16:07] Thelas: Example after 117.3c in rules:
Example: A player controls Lodestone Golem, which says "Nonartifact spells cost 1 more to cast." Another player removes the last time counter from a suspended sorcery card. That player must cast that spell if able, but doing so costs 1. The player is forced to spend 1 if enough mana is in his or her mana pool, but the player isn't forced to activate a mana ability to produce that 1. If he or she doesn't, the card simply remains exiled.
[16:07] MairQ: Is not a MANA cost!!!!!+
[16:08] mikey234: that doesnt matter
[16:08] Mokermann: that so funny boys. let me sreenshot that.
[16:08] Zoan: just t throw in some more, its absouletly right that thalia those increase flashback costs which don't include mana by 1 mana, i dont even get how you might doubt that
[16:09] Thelas: oh hey look, I found another relevant rule
117.9d. If an alternative cost is being paid to cast a spell, any additional costs, cost increases, and cost reductions that affect that spell are applied to that alternative cost. (See rule 601.2e.)
TLDR : Au final, j'ai gagné le combat mental, mais à une demi-douzaine, on a pas réussi à lui faire comprendre. La vie est rude les amis.
#189553 SCG Colombus
Posté
- 19 June 2013 - 09:08
Même en temps que joueur de TT, je dois avouer que le patriot delver m'intrigue beaucoup.
Le slot hexproof est pris par Geist à ma place de mangouste. C'est certes une 2/2 mais dois je rappeler qu'une mangouste non seuillée (ce qui est souvent le cas t3) est une 1/1? Ou que geist généralement colle 6 et pas 3 ou qu'il est insensible à un early drs ou rip?
Par ailleurs, je trouve le joue moins tempo mais plus consistant : on a de l'anti betes via les stp, du CA via snapcaster et plus de late game face à controle avec geist.
Perso, il me faut pas vraiment plus que des bons résultats et un build cohérent sur le papier pour intégrer un jeu à mes tables de tests : patriot passe le cut
Le slot hexproof est pris par Geist à ma place de mangouste. C'est certes une 2/2 mais dois je rappeler qu'une mangouste non seuillée (ce qui est souvent le cas t3) est une 1/1? Ou que geist généralement colle 6 et pas 3 ou qu'il est insensible à un early drs ou rip?
Par ailleurs, je trouve le joue moins tempo mais plus consistant : on a de l'anti betes via les stp, du CA via snapcaster et plus de late game face à controle avec geist.
Perso, il me faut pas vraiment plus que des bons résultats et un build cohérent sur le papier pour intégrer un jeu à mes tables de tests : patriot passe le cut
#183465 Besoin d'aide pour améliorer un deck
Posté
- 07 April 2013 - 19:29
En fait ça me fait penser au pack de Lejay, tu joues Jace-Liliana-Fow-Shaman quoi
1 Badlands
2 Bayou
2 Misty Rainforest
4 Polluted Delta
1 Swamp
2 Tropical Island
3 Underground Sea
4 Verdant Catacombs
4 Wasteland
3 Baleful Strix
4 Deathrite Shaman
4 Shardless Agent
4 Tarmogoyf
4 Abrupt Decay
4 Ancestral Vision
4 Brainstorm
4 Force of Will
3 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
4 Liliana of the Veil
SB: 4 Duress
SB: 2 Leyline of the Void
SB: 3 Thoughtseize
SB: 2 Vendilion Clique
SB: 4 Whipflare
Un truc comme ça. Tu as ton spalsh rouge, des contres, de la draw, de la gestion de permanent, tes arpenteurs, et ça gagne tout seul en mode chatte avec agent->vision
1 Badlands
2 Bayou
2 Misty Rainforest
4 Polluted Delta
1 Swamp
2 Tropical Island
3 Underground Sea
4 Verdant Catacombs
4 Wasteland
3 Baleful Strix
4 Deathrite Shaman
4 Shardless Agent
4 Tarmogoyf
4 Abrupt Decay
4 Ancestral Vision
4 Brainstorm
4 Force of Will
3 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
4 Liliana of the Veil
SB: 4 Duress
SB: 2 Leyline of the Void
SB: 3 Thoughtseize
SB: 2 Vendilion Clique
SB: 4 Whipflare
Un truc comme ça. Tu as ton spalsh rouge, des contres, de la draw, de la gestion de permanent, tes arpenteurs, et ça gagne tout seul en mode chatte avec agent->vision
#188429 BOM 7 du 8 au 12 Mai 2013
Posté
- 04 June 2013 - 21:27
Et pour conclure ce topic :
WATCHDAMATCH ON VEUT LES DECKTECHS DU BOM !!!!! (svp)
Déluge de like !
WATCHDAMATCH ON VEUT LES DECKTECHS DU BOM !!!!! (svp)
Déluge de like !
#188181 Voilà ce qu'il se passe quand...
Posté
- 02 June 2013 - 20:25
Voila ce qu'il se passe quand tu joue contre jund qui mulligan a 4 et qui te fait quand meme avec sa pioche:
T1 deathrite
T2 hymn to tourach
T3 liliana
T4 tarmogoyf...
T1 deathrite
T2 hymn to tourach
T3 liliana
T4 tarmogoyf...
#187517 Jace ne casse plus Jace
Posté
- 26 May 2013 - 12:25
Cette révision du statut des Légendes et Planeswalkers me chiffonne aussi plus d'un point de vue flaveur que d'un point de vue situations de jeu.
Avoir une Légende ou un Planeswalker en jeu sous son contrôle, c'était niveau puissance et feeling comme avoir Chuck Norris dans ses troupes.
Et on n'imagine pas Chuck Norris pouvoir être dans deux camps à la fois.
A plusieurs endroits en même temps, sûrement, tellement il est rapide.
Mais se combattre lui même, c'est fort improbable et l'issue impossible à envisager : Chuck Norris qui gagne on voit ça très bien mais Chuck Norris qui perd, imaginez les conséquences pour le continuum espace-temps...
Bref, niveaux règles, je vivrai très bien le truc mais niveau saveur de jeu je crois qu'un truc se perd. Pas un truc capital mais un truc perdu quand même.
On s'en remettra.
Sinon, dans la même veine que les frères Yamazaki, un horrible nouvelle défraie la chronique :
On a appris que Voja, l'éternel compagnon de Tolsimir Wolfblood n'était pas aussi éternel qu'on le croyait. Dès que Voja devenait trop âgé, Tolsimir en achetait un nouveau et laissait l'ancien mourir lors de la vérification des effets basés sur un état. Sordide histoire, vraiment...
Avoir une Légende ou un Planeswalker en jeu sous son contrôle, c'était niveau puissance et feeling comme avoir Chuck Norris dans ses troupes.
Et on n'imagine pas Chuck Norris pouvoir être dans deux camps à la fois.
A plusieurs endroits en même temps, sûrement, tellement il est rapide.
Mais se combattre lui même, c'est fort improbable et l'issue impossible à envisager : Chuck Norris qui gagne on voit ça très bien mais Chuck Norris qui perd, imaginez les conséquences pour le continuum espace-temps...
Bref, niveaux règles, je vivrai très bien le truc mais niveau saveur de jeu je crois qu'un truc se perd. Pas un truc capital mais un truc perdu quand même.
On s'en remettra.
Sinon, dans la même veine que les frères Yamazaki, un horrible nouvelle défraie la chronique :
On a appris que Voja, l'éternel compagnon de Tolsimir Wolfblood n'était pas aussi éternel qu'on le croyait. Dès que Voja devenait trop âgé, Tolsimir en achetait un nouveau et laissait l'ancien mourir lors de la vérification des effets basés sur un état. Sordide histoire, vraiment...
#186720 Voilà ce qu'il se passe quand...
Posté
- 17 May 2013 - 16:16
Quand tu castes baleful strix avec liliana of the veil sur table ! =)
